O'Reilly Forums: The Possibility Of Unification Theory In Physics - O'Reilly Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The Possibility Of Unification Theory In Physics The unification of gravity, electromagnetism, inertia, and F=ma

#1 User is offline   Unite physics 

  • New Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: 30-September 10

Posted 30 September 2010 - 08:32 AM

Since the self ultimately represents, forms, and experiences a comprehensive approximation of the totality of experience by combining conscious and unconscious experience, then our growth and our being/becoming other than we are necessarily requires and involves a fundamental extension, integration, and transcendency of the laws/forces of physics.

The extension of the self in and with time and space is demonstrative of (and requires) the union of gravity and electromagnetism. Indeed, the experience of the body is inseparable from the laws/forces of physics.

It is impossible that the mathematical union of Einstein's theory of gravity and Maxwell's theory of light/electromagnetism is a meaningless coincidence or an error.
This union must be plainly and siginficanly present/manifest in our experience.

The structure and form of thought is generally reflected in the structure of experience, and this is ultimately reflected in the laws/forces of physics.

This also reveals the limits of physics, as the ability of thought to describe (including mathematically) OR reconfigure (as in dreams) sense is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience. Indeed, this accounts for the "unreasonable effectiveness" of mathematics.

Thought is fundamentally quantum mechanical, gravitational, electromagnetic, and inertial in its constitution, structure, and form.

The [Einstein/Maxwell] mathematical unification in a fourth spatial dimension indicates space that is stretched and thereby flattened, as the result of combining a larger and smaller space. In unifying gravity and electromagnetism, balanced attraction and repusion average/reduce gravity in conjunction with relatively increased inertia and relatively decreased gravity, on balance.

Can F=ma demonstrate quantum gravity? Yes, when distance in space is averaged/reduced in conjunction with fundamentally balanced repulsion and attraction and increased inertia that is offset by/balanced with reduced gravity. Space then manifests as gravitational/electromagnetic energy, as gravitational contraction may be understood as being balanced by/offset with electromagnetic repulsion. Such a stable, fundamental, and balanced [distance in] space requires that an inherently larger space and an inherently smaller space be combined.

These are the theoretical requirements of quantum gravity and of space manifesting as inertial/gravitational/electromagnetic binding energy.

When space is smaller and larger, inertia is relatively increased, and gravity is proportionately reduced accordingly.

Question and comments welcome.
0

#2 User is offline   HeatherLang 

  • Active Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: O'Reilly Author
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 17-September 08

Posted 07 October 2010 - 01:16 PM

It would be interesting to know what you think of the book Head First Physics, which is what this forum has been set up to discuss.
0

#3 User is offline   Unite physics 

  • New Member
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: 30-September 10

Posted 27 October 2010 - 09:08 AM

Hi Heather. You are working from the bottom up (so to speak), and I am working from the top down. Therefore, maybe we can advance the understanding of physics by meeting in the middle. Indeed, it is important to combine and include opposites and extremes in order to increase the integrated extensiveness of description/understanding in physics.

Increasing the INTEGRATED EXTENSIVESS of description (generally, that is) is exactly what we are both here to do.

I have not yet had a chance to buy your book yet, but I have heard good things about it.

I applaude your efforts to make physics more simple and readily comprehensible to the masses.

We are in apparent agreement that physics is far more fundamental and important to the totality of our experience (and/or our daily experience) than has been previously recognized.

What are your thoughts on the following (below) please? I would like us to exchange ideas. Let's move physics forwad. Author Frank Martin DiMeglio

We should be able to exchange some good, new considerations and ideas for future work/writings in physics.

Serious changes to the scope and direction of physics are under way.
=====================================
Balanced and fundamental inertia and gravity/accel. are equivalent manifestations of the same thing. This fixes/determines BOTH distance in space AND position relative to distance in space. This requires balanced attraction and repulsion as relatively [constant] binding energy. Combining and including smaller and larger space gets us there.

Balanced/equivalent inertia/resistance to accel. AND gravity/acceleration are essential to/for balanced/fundamental distance in space (smaller and larger space) -- whereby attraction and repulsion are balanced/equivalent in conjunction therewith. The size/distance of space ultimately and fundamentally balances scale in keeping with generally flattened and stretched/expanded space. (This provides quantum gravity too.) Gravitational contraction is thus balanced with electromagnetic repulsion. (Completeness and balance.) A larger AND smaller space proportionately increase inertia while AVERAGING/reducing gravity on balance, thereby achieving inertial and gravitational balancing/equivalency. MIDDLE/typical/average distance in space is thus MIDDLE gravity and middle inertia. Again, this balances attraction and repulsion, equates gravity and inertia with equal strength/force, and balances/fixes distance in space/scale. This is space manifesting as quantum gravity and as gravitational/electromagnetic energy. Gravity is key to distance in space. Reducing gravity with distance is thus understood together (on balance) with increasing gravity with distance. Average/middle inertia and average/middle gravity = average/middle/typical (and elemental or fundamental) distance in space. Unification accomplished. This should be the next contest. These are the fundamental and theoretical requirements of unification:

quantum gravity

balanced/equivalent attraction/repulsion

space manifesting as inertial/gravitational/electromagnetic binding energy

inertial/gravitational equivalency

middle/typical/average distance in space -- balanced/united scale.

Here is further clarification on how to fundamentally advance physics. The theoretical requirements of a unified understanding of physics are not only feasible, but they may be outlined or understood as follows:

The [Einstein/Maxwell] mathematical unification in a fourth spatial dimension indicates space that is stretched and thereby flattened, as the result of combining a larger and smaller space. In unifying gravity and electromagnetism, balanced attraction and repulsion average/reduce gravity in conjunction with relatively increased inertia and relatively decreased gravity, on balance.

Can F=ma demonstrate quantum gravity? Yes, when distance in space is averaged/reduced in conjunction with fundamentally balanced repulsion and attraction and increased inertia that is offset by/balanced with reduced gravity. Space then manifests as gravitational/electromagnetic energy, as gravitational contraction may be understood as being balanced by/offset with electromagnetic repulsion. Such a stable, fundamental, and balanced [distance in] space requires that an inherently larger space and an inherently smaller space be combined.

These are the theoretical requirements of quantum gravity and of space manifesting as inertial/gravitational/electromagnetic binding energy.

When space is smaller and larger, inertia is relatively increased, and gravity is proportionately reduced accordingly.

Balanced and fundamental inetia and gravity/accel. are equivalent manifestations of the same thing. This fixes/determines BOTH distance in space AND position relative to distance in space. This requires balanced attraction and repulsion as binding energy.

Gravity is key to distance in space. You will never understand the union of inertia, gravity/accel., and electromagnetism until you understand this. You must balance/equate gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism/light in conjunction with balanced and fundamental scale/distance and attraction/repulsion.


0

#4 User is offline   HeatherLang 

  • Active Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: O'Reilly Author
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 17-September 08

Posted 08 November 2010 - 12:45 AM

This forum is for the discussion of the book "Head First Physics". Please could you keep your posts on topic.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users