Image Map Response Time Is Greater Than Non Image Map, Image map response time is greater than non image map |
![]() ![]() |
Image Map Response Time Is Greater Than Non Image Map, Image map response time is greater than non image map |
Mar 4 2009, 07:00 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
|
Hello
am trying steve souders example for the Image map using Fire fox No image map http://stevesouders.com/hpws/imagemap-no.php?t=1202374052139 Image map http://stevesouders.com/hpws/imagemap.php?t=1202374081920 I found that the response time of the image map page take 2204 ms while no image map takes: 1506 ms which is less than image map Can Any one explain why the non image map is faster than the image map ? Secondly:- The previous numbers are different from Fire fox to IE? Would you please advise? |
|
|
|
Mar 11 2009, 11:23 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
|
The results can differ depending on your geo location, bandwidth connection, and browser. FF3, IE8, Saf 3+, Op 9+, and Chrome all download more resources in parallel than browsers did when that example was created. It's best to try this in IE7 - that's a popular browser that still opens just two connections per hostname.
|
|
|
|
Aug 22 2009, 10:43 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
|
The results can differ depending on your geo location, bandwidth connection, and browser. FF3, IE8, Saf 3+, Op 9+, and Chrome all download more resources in parallel than browsers did when that example was created. It's best to try this in IE7 - that's a popular browser that still opens just two connections per hostname. I tried it out in internet explorer 7 and it solved my problem out! Thanks mate! -------------------- Does Someone Do Medical Assistant Jobs like me? then please guide me to start a Medical Assistant Career.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd November 2009 - 05:00 AM |